(Nota de Luminoso Futuro: Aquí publicamos un importante documento del Partido Comunista de Nepal (maoísta) el que se refleja el nivel de la lucha entre dos líneas en su seno. El Documento de los 18 puntos, reflejante de las posiciones y reivindicaciones del grupo liderado por Mohan Baidhya Kiran miembro del Comité Central, presentado a consideración de todo el Partido frente a aquellas de Pushpa Kamal Dahal (Prachanda) y que le señala de desviaciones conciliacionistas y componendas en beneficio del “expansionismo indio y su burguesía compradora”. Hoy afloran públicamente la lucha de clase en el seno del PCN (m), revolucionarios proletarios vrs revisionitas).
Now we have more than 18
By The Next Front
Few days back the revolutionary faction lead by Comrade Mohan Baidhya Kiran had distributed a ‘18 point notification’ paper among the cadres. It was not a allegation paper, it was based on facts and figures. The central point of that 18 point paper is clear, it is open to all: Now Pushpa Kamal Dahal has lost his political standing in the party and has become unable to lead it. He has betrayed the revolution, he is no more a revolutionary leader. A person who encourages the fascist tendencies and physical attacks on the Comrades in Arms within the party, how can be a leader of the party and the People Û Now we have not only 18 points, numbers of points have increased. But this time, we are posting those 18 points:
1. Eclecticism in philosophy,
2. On the political front, is seen moving toward rightist reformism and national capitulationism from his centrist opportunist
3. Dahal recognizes that party’s prime contradiction lay with India, its agents and the local feudal forces, but in practice he is acting just the otherwise,
4. Dahal focuses on cooperating with the local forces that favor Indian expansionism and its agents in Nepal,
5. Verbally Dahal stresses on cooperation with nationalists, communists and republicans but in practice he has been cooperating with the Indian expansionists and their cohorts,
6. At a time when our territories are being continuously encroached upon and demographic invasion is taking place, Dahal has made the citizenship distribution process flexible,
7. Dahal has supported Indian investments in Upper Karnali and Arun-III hydro-power projects.
8. Dahal is impeding party’s fraternal relations with international revolutionary forces, whereas he has also been maintaining relations with class enemies more so, Indian intelligence agents,
9. On the issue of financial discipline, [Dahal] is seen tilted toward corruption. [Dahal] is seen having the tendency of doing anything — both moral and immoral — for the sake of power, money and prestige.[Dahal] has deliberately left the party without an accounting system and misused financial means and resources in an individualistic way,
10. Dahal deviated from the party´s ideological goals by not launching appropriate programs to counter the party´s “principal enemy” — India — and accused Dahal of extending relations with the sympathizers of “Indian expansionism and its comprador class”.
11. Despite being said that we would go for a federal system with autonomy to ethnicities, [Dahal] has emphasized unitary and centralized system,” states the document. “bourgeois theory of separation of power, and to minimize the participation of people in the judiciary under the pretext of judicial independence, instead of empowering the People´s Assembly for “Federal democratic republic” instead of the party´s line of “People´s Federal Democratic Republic,”
12. Financial irregularities and misuse of resources,
13. “Fascist tendency”, intolerance toward those holding dissent abusing his power to silence their voices.
14. Self-centric individualistic tendency,
15. Extending relations with the Indian intelligence agencies,
16. Disarming the PLA and emptying the cantonments in the name of “regrouping” without forging a national security policy, controlling the open border and setting up a border security force.
17. Bourgeois theory of separation of power, and to minimize the participation of people in the judiciary under the pretext of judicial independence, instead of empowering the People´s Assembly.
18. Agreeing to make appointments of judges by a commission, not by the federal assembly as demanded by the party.
000000
Publicado por The Next Front
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario